Guns for Toys
Sunday, December 28th, 2008GUNS FOR TOYS
by Michael W. Dean
(GREAT AMERICAN PAMPHLET #1-MP)
In the spirit of Christmas, I was thinking it might be a good idea for someone somewhere sometime to have a “Guns for Toys” drive.
It would be a great a protest against those idiotic “Toys for Guns” swaps. Here’s one from my county, second one this month. This “Gifts for Guns” drive is in response to a gang shooting:
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-guns24-2008dec24,0,904693.story?track=rss
(Do you think all the local criminals with guns heard about this, were touched by the passion of it and said, “Oh, think of the children! Let’s stop the fussin’ and the fightin’, turn in our guns and just try to get along from now on!”?)
Gun-grabbers use toys-for-guns drives and “gun buybacks” to give people a false sense of safety, thinking they’re disarming criminals. That’s total BS. Only non-criminals will trade guns for toys. Gun grabbers also use the drives to condition the public to believe that handing over your guns to the government is a normal, even happy, thing to do. And they usually do the drives in dangerous neighborhoods. They’re basically just disarming potential victims, not criminals. (The drive linked above was in South Central Los Angeles. But it’s warming hearts from the Valley to Beverly Hills, if you believe what you see on the evening news.)
Toys-for-guns drives also get free billboards from Gannett and other companies, and get a lot of free radio and TV time. It’s always spun with a “THINK OF THE CHILDREN!” angle.
And the cops get some sweet guns, usually from grandmothers and widows who’ve had them in their attic, for free. The “toys” usually don’t come out of the cops’ pockets. The gifts-for-guns drive linked above offered a a 100-dollar gift card donated by some local businesses.
When it’s a “gun buyback” (specious term. How can the government buy BACK something they never owned?), sometimes public funds ARE used. Which is unconstitutional, because it’s using public money not to buy something for public use, but to buy something that is then destroyed. There is no public benefit in that.
I doubt that all the guns are even really destroyed at every “gun buyback” and toys-for-guns drive. How much do you wanna bet that nationwide, sometimes the cops keep the really expensive guns? I’ll bet sometimes they’re shooting those “destroyed” guns at the police range the next day.
A guns-for-toys raffle could attract a lot of attention, even national attention. It might seem like it would be the wrong kind of attention, but if you had your soundbites in order, it might work in a good way.
Guns usually are worth more than a toy. I think the economics of this event would be such that you’d have people give a toy to enter a raffle to win a gun. Maybe have two prizes, each of one gun, so the plural of “gunS for toys” would be satisfied. It might be better press-wise if you gave away a rifle and a shotgun, rather than two sidearms. That would also be cheaper than a good sidearm, if you used, say, a Remington 870 and a Marlin 60, which are both decent guns.
The entrants would obviously have to satisfy the state and federal requirements for owning a gun.
But anyway, you’d have your raffle, give the toys to some deserving kids (cancer victims always play nice in the press, so do kids of laid-off parents around Christmas time), and the lucky winner gets a sweet gun. You could have some second-place prizes, maybe ammo and holsters.
You’d have to check the laws (I’d ask a lawyer) to see about the legality of raffling a gun. I wouldn’t recommend doing it as “It’s OK if I go to jail” activism if it’s not legal, because it would involve other people, and if no one wins the gun, it would make the whole thing look bad.
Maybe a local gun store would be interested in helping? Maybe the JPFO, GOA or NRA would be into helping, or at least publicizing? Maybe ask your fellow statesman Massad Ayoob if he’d give some training as a additional prize.
I’m not going to try a guns-for-toys drive in Southern California, the gun grabbers would probably burn my house down. But it just might work in New Hampshire.
MWD
p.s. I just registered
http://www.gunsfortoys.org
and
http://www.gunsfortoys.com
I’m just rolling both over to my blog as placeholders for now. If someone wants to do this for real, I’ll let them have the domains.
Amazingly,
toysforguns.com
and
toysforguns.org
are also available. I’m not going to bother with those, but if someone really wants to do this, they might want to get those too, to roll over to
gunsfortoys.org
once the site is set up.
–
THIS POST IS MICHAEL W. DEAN’S GREAT AMERICAN PAMPHLET #1-MP (MP stands for “Modest Proposal”).
Like all MWD Great American Pamphlets, this is covered by a Creative Commons share and sharealike license. Feel free to share and repost, with attribution, anywhere, for any purpose.







